Re: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
From: Paolo Alexis Falcone <pfalcone@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:49:17 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 1114130957.19831.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2679570105042117461597ace5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 2679570105042117461597ace5@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 20:46 -0400, hell0 un1verse wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I am running Sid with 2.4 kernel on a ThinkPad T42 with Pentium M
> 1.7GHz CPU, I wanna upgrade to 2.6 kernel, my question is should I
> upgrade with 2.6-386 or 2.6-686, or some other specific kernel?
> Thanks.
> 
Either would do - although for speed benefits I choose the 686 kernel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
  - From: Marco Calviani <mirtux@studenti.fisica.unifi.it>

References:
- Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
  - From: hell0 un1verse <hell0un1verse@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
Next by Date: Re: Disk full, no ssh access??
Previous by thread: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
Next by thread: Re: Should I use 686 specific kernel on Pentium M?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread