[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel-image: 2.6-686 vs 2.6.8-2-686



On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:24:30AM -0800, rds wrote:
> Upon further consideration I think I should've installed kernel-image-2.6-686
> package. It'd be nice if someone could confirm it for sure. Thanks
> 
> --- rds <rustydstone@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Would someone clarify what kernel-image needs to be installed to keep the
> > system updated when new kernel are made available?
> > 
> > I installed kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 and everything is working fine. From the
> > package descriptions it appears that kernel-image-2.6-686 is the package that
> > always points to the latest available kernel image, thus automatically
> > upgrading kernel whenever "aptitude upgrade" is run.
> > 
> > Should I have installed kernel-image-2.6-686 instead of
> > kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 to ensure that aptitude upgrades the kernel image
> > whenever a newer version is available?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
I think 2.6-686 uses the latest kernel in the testing repo, so you
should use it.  Also of note is the fact that 2.6.10 is available in
unstable, but 2.6-686 only installs 2.6.8, which I believe is the latest
available in testing.

-- 
Nick Price
http://www.tehmatix.net/
nick@tehmatix.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: