Re: OOo startup - resolution

[Lee Braiden <jel@tundra.ath.cx>]

On Saturday 12 March 2005 16:39, Rob Bochan wrote:
> If I may interject for a moment here... I find it a shame (even ridiculous
> perhaps?) that OOo is window manager dependent for a process like this,

Personally, I find the idea of running without a window manager very strange.  
Perhaps I'm wrong, but it seems to me that window managers are separate for 
architectural reasons, but not intended to be missing.  X on its own provides 
less UI control than a modern console-based application; adding a window 
manager provides just that: window management.  I don't think a locked-down, 
kiosk-type interface requires the window manager functionality to be removed.

-- 
Lee.