[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Installing nVidia drivers?



hey!

Well what I done: downloaded a vanilla kernel from kernel.org
(matching version of your own) done a make menuconfig and never
changed *anything* and then I saved the configuration and ran make
over it and once that was done I done sh nvidiadriver.sh
--kernel-source-path /path/to/your/stock/kernel and then it found it
with no problems.

That. hopefully will sort out most of your problems.

HTH,

Tam.


On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:08:02 -0600, SigmaX <scottclansman@cwazy.co.uk> wrote:
> Hey;
> 
>     I'm running Sid on a computer with an nVidia graphics card.  It
> works fine with the Vesa driver for every day use, but anything
> graphically intense runs really really slow... so, of course, I want to
> install the nVidia drivers.  I installed the packages from non-free, and
> made nVidia's required changes to the XF86Config-4 file, but it gives me
> errors when I try to start X. I'm using Kernel 2.4.27 (Seemed that the
> nVidia kernel module was designed for it, so I'm not using 2.6.10 though
> I have it installed).
>     I tried downloading the driver direct from nVidia's website, but it
> said it couldn't find a driver for my kernel and would have to compile
> from source, and then couldn't find my source tree.  I installed the
> kernel-source packages for both 2.4.27 and 2.6.10, and could try letting
> it compile from source, but I'm still bunked as to why the binary
> packages didn't work from the mirrors.
> 
>              Basically I installed the nVidia deb packages for my
> kernel... what else do I need to do to get them working?
>     Thanx,
>        SigmaX
> 
> --
> Registered Linux Freak #: 366,862
> 
> "If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free."
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
>



Reply to: