[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aptitude: packages have been kept back?



On Oct 17, 2004, at 5:51 AM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Katipo <katipo@weavers-web.org> [2004 Oct 16 21:56 -0500]:
ms419@freezone.co.uk wrote:

Can anyone suggest how else to learn more about aptitude's problem
with these "kept back" packages?

Thanks!

Which packages are you referring to exactly?
Regards,

The list of packages being kept back is growing each time I run "aptitude dist-upgrade". Here is a current example:

	wum:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
	Reading Package Lists... Done
	Building Dependency Tree
	Reading extended state information
	Initializing package states... Done
	Reading task descriptions... Done
	The following packages have been kept back:
	  apt aptitude autofs bash bind9 bsdmainutils debianutils fakeroot gawk
	  grep heimdal-dev libapache-mod-ssl libapache2-svn libapt-pkg-perl
libasn1-6-heimdal libdevmapper1.00 libdiscover1 libdiscover1-pic libgcc1
	  libgpmg1 libgssapi1-heimdal libhdb7-heimdal libkadm5clnt4-heimdal
	  libkadm5srv7-heimdal libkafs0-heimdal libkrb5-17-heimdal libnewt-dev
	  libnewt-pic libnewt0.51 libpng12-0 libreadline-common libreadline4
libsasl2 libsasl2-gssapi-mit libtiff4 libxml2 libxslt1.1 netselect nscd
	  quagga sasl2-bin slrn ssh-krb5 strace whiptail whois xsltproc
	The following packages will be upgraded:
	  libexpat1
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 47 not upgraded.
	Need to get 59.5kB of archives. After unpacking 4096B will be used.
	Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?]

"apt-get dist-upgrade" doesn't have this problem:

	wum:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
	Reading Package Lists... Done
	Building Dependency Tree... Done
	Calculating Upgrade... Done
	The following packages will be upgraded:
apt aptitude autofs bash bind9 bsdmainutils debianutils fakeroot gawk grep
	  heimdal-dev libapache-mod-ssl libapache2-svn libapt-pkg-perl
libasn1-6-heimdal libdevmapper1.00 libdiscover1 libdiscover1-pic libexpat1 libgcc1 libgpmg1 libgssapi1-heimdal libhdb7-heimdal libkadm5clnt4-heimdal
	  libkadm5srv7-heimdal libkafs0-heimdal libkrb5-17-heimdal libnewt-dev
libnewt-pic libnewt0.51 libpng12-0 libreadline-common libreadline4 libsasl2
	  libsasl2-gssapi-mit libtiff4 libxml2 libxslt1.1 netselect nscd quagga
	  sasl2-bin slrn ssh-krb5 strace whiptail whois xsltproc
	48 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
	1 not fully installed or removed.
	Need to get 8988kB/11.7MB of archives.
	After unpacking 1128kB disk space will be freed.
	Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

Here is a view from aptitude; I don't know how to un-hold bash, or why in this case aptitude wants to remove it:

	 Actions  Undo  Package  Search  Options  Views  Help
	f10: Menu  ?: Help  q: Quit  u: Update  g: Download/Install/Remove Pkgs
aptitude 0.2.15.8 #Broken: 94 Will free 373MB of disk space DL Size: 59.5kB id bash -1589kB 3.0-7 3.0-8 id bsdutils -160kB 1:2.12-10 1:2.12-10 p cfdisk-utf8 <none> 2.11n-5+1 id coreutils -7266kB 5.2.1-2 5.2.1-2 id debianutils -238kB 2.10.2 2.10.3 id dpkg -3961kB 1.10.23 1.10.23 id dselect -471kB 1.10.23 1.10.23 id e2fsprogs -1286kB 1.35-8 1.35-8 p elilo <none> 3.4-8 p elvis-tiny <none> 1.4-18
	The GNU Bourne Again SHell
Bash is an sh-compatible command language interpreter that executes commands a read from the standard input or from a file. Bash also incorporates useful a features from the Korn and C shells (ksh and csh). a a Bash is ultimately intended to be a conformant implementation of the IEEE POSIXa Shell and Tools specification (IEEE Working Group 1003.2). a a Included in the bash package is the Programmable Completion Code, by Ian a Macdonald. a a

I haven't held or removed any packages - only run "aptitude".

This seems to be a new feature of some releases back.  Try hitting
Shift-u and see if they are now marked as upgradable.

Thank you for your suggestion! Unfortunately I found <shift>-u had no effect.

What is wrong with aptitude? Has no one else observed this behavior? I am experiencing it on each of three machines running Debian.

Many thanks for your help!

Jack



Reply to: