[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] yahoo protocol switching



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nori Heikkinen <nori@sccs.swarthmore.edu> writes:

> yeah?  this wouldn't put undue load on you?

Not really, no, as long as we're not talking about your entire company
or anything like that (mostly for reliability issues, house full of
roommates).

> it would be cool to test out, to then try to slowly migrate people in
> the company over ... i think half of their objection is setting up /
> maintaining the server, and they're clearly not worried about
> security, as we've been using ya-f*ing-hoo forever ... (the other
> half, of course, is getting the luddites to learn one new application,
> but that could come with time).

I never understood how hard it can be for some people to learn an almost
totally identical piece of software.  I'm very tempted to say that they
shouldn't be allowed to drive a car under any circumstances if switching
software is a problem.  Sure, they drive a Honda stickshift, but what if
they need to drive an automatic Buick?  If they're that thrown by minor
differences in software, what hope do we have of them being able to
operate very slightly different controls properly in a car?

Please ask that of the luddites...

- -- 
Paul Johnson
<baloo@ursine.ca>
Linux.  You can find a worse OS, but it costs more.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA3GnuUzgNqloQMwcRAk06AKCtKiYcchqCN8TalWYlvYP1aVzR/wCgmIc0
x0IORJP1scPczeDn5HSB8tQ=
=xKLk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: