Re: Website creating software
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:14:47PM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:36:27AM -0400 or thereabouts, Nick Smith wrote:
>
> > forget frontpage, what about a dreamweaver alternative? i do respect the hand
> > coding people out there, i too started coding with VI, but there is no way im
> > going to design complex image maps or anything else with lengthy code by hand
> > any more, too much chance for error and it takes way too long to do it. i
> > wish wine would pick up the pace and get compatible with MX 2004 and for that
> > matter photoshop CS. but i would be happy with just a dreamweaver alternative.
> > which in my search i can find nothing that comes close to the power of
> > dreamweaver. ps, im not knocking frontpage, i too have used it, but every
> > page i have created or seen created with it just doesnt look as professional
> > as compaired to what you can do with dreamweaver. most people go with front
> > page because dreamweaver has a much higher learning curve, but once you master
> > it you can do wonders.
>
> Drifting away from Linux Visual Editors...
>
> FrontPage 2003 is vastly superior to anything prior, in the FPage line. I'm
> definitely not a MSFT lover, but FP is closing the gap fast to DWMX. If I was
> doing any .NET web applications, I'd be using FrontPage 2003 before DWMX.
>
The main problem with FrontPage and DWMX is that they tend to be very
incompatible with anything other then explorer, especially when using
dhtml and css, but also some features with regular html.
> A comparison chart of the major PC/Mac Visual Web Page Editors, can be found here;
>
> <http://mvp.wiserways.com/2003/compare.htm>
>
> --
> Steve
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Tuesday Jun 08 2004 10:01:01 PM EDT
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Azh nazg durbatal^uk, azh nazg gimbatul,
> Azh nazg thrakatal^uk agh burzum ishi krimpatul!
> -- J. R. R. Tolkien
Reply to: