Re: Database performance

To: Debian User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Database performance
From: "Christopher L. Everett" <ceverett@ceverett.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:20:43 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 406F9B2B.6020704@ceverett.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 406F80D0.9060700@ceverett.com>
References: <[🔎] 406F6017.8030602@ceverett.com> <[🔎] c4nnn0$an2$2@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 406F6A1D.9000101@ceverett.com> <[🔎] c4nrsg$hch$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 406F80D0.9060700@ceverett.com>

Christopher L. Everett wrote:

<snip>
IIRC, RAID 1 gives the best performance under all conditions :),though it's
not terribly safe.


substitute raid 0 (striping) for raid 1, and that last makes sense.

--
Christopher L. Everett

Chief Technology Officer                               www.medbanner.com
MedBanner, Inc.                                          www.physemp.com

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Database performance
  - From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>

References:
- Database performance
  - From: "Christopher L. Everett" <ceverett@ceverett.com>
- Re: Database performance
  - From: Adam Aube <aaube01@baker.edu>
- Re: Database performance
  - From: "Christopher L. Everett" <ceverett@ceverett.com>
- Re: Database performance
  - From: Adam Aube <aaube01@baker.edu>
- Re: Database performance
  - From: "Christopher L. Everett" <ceverett@ceverett.com>

Prev by Date: slrn drawing characters problem in Konsole
Next by Date: Re: Database performance
Previous by thread: Re: Database performance
Next by thread: Re: Database performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread