Re: Email client programs
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I know this is not a windows list and I have never yet asked a question
like this on here before, but perhaps there is someone who knows the
answer to this question.
Netscape and Mozilla support "offline" modes where a user can sync
themselves to the server and then be offline. This would minimize
traffic to only specific times (perhaps there are times where your
network is noticibly better than other times?).
Neither POP3 nor IMAP nor anything else will fix a problem at the
network level. This seems obvious. Either the network works well, or
it doesn't. Applications at layer 7 of the OSI model suffer when the
lower layers don't operate correctly.
You could also do things to cover up the network problem like putting a
mail server on board the vessel and letting that server take the errors
and hits between the main server and itself, where they'll only be seen
by the administrators in the server logs. End-users get mail once it's
fully transferred to the mail server on-board the vessel. A cheap older
machine with a couple of redundant hard disks, at least RAID 1 (if
there's no admin on-board) and fetchmail could do this job and it could
be built in just a few days including test time in port where the
network is good. Tests while the network is bad could be simulated.
Spend the energy fixing the network. Tell people it's broken. Don't
just cover it up right away and pretend that problem is not there.
It's the only thing that will help long-term. Anything else is just an
unprofessional hack.
If e-mail is a *requirement* for the vessels (bosses say it HAS to
work), then so is a good network connection.
Making a bad network "just work" by futzing around with the mail client
just dooms you to failure again someday in the future when people think
things "are working" and they start using the network for other things
besides mail.
Nate Duehr, nate@natetech.com
Reply to: