On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:12:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > There's no way that xv is GPL, much less DSFG-free. I never claimed that it was either one. In fact, I pointed out that it was NOT DFSG-free, and why it was not. The xv license restricts distribution and use. It's as simple as that. I used the GPL, the premiere example of a "free" software license, the one that the religious zealots wrap themselves in at every opportunity, to show why charging for software had nothing to do with the "freeness" of it. -- Marc Wilson | The older a man gets, the farther he had to walk to msw@cox.net | school as a boy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature