[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dual Xeon Kernel?



Sorry... Im getting confused. I should be running this kernel. *right*?

kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.6.8 on Intel EM64T SMP systems

Simon Buchanan wrote:
Yep.. But the server i have is a dual xeon. Which is *NOT* 64bit - right? Are you saying that the AMD64 is faster as an alternative for the xeon?

Ron Johnson wrote:

On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:00 +1300, Simon Buchanan wrote:

Is there a benifit to running in 64bit mode? This is a mail server running postfix and DBmail.



AMD64 is faster at most all CPU-bound operations.  SpamAssassin
tends to be CPU- and RAM-intensive, so maybe there would be some
benefit.  (In benchmarks, AMD64 is never *slower* than Athlon XP,
but performs some benchmarks in the same amount of clock time.

And, of course, if you're going to use a lot of 4GB+ of RAM, AMD64 is *the* way to go.


Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:38:43 +1300, Simon Buchanan <nmc@orcon.net.nz> wrote:


Hi There,

I am just about to install sarge onto a dual xeon (Nocona 800MHz FSB)
server... and just checking the kernel with 'atp-cache search
kernel-image'. Im wanting to use the 2.6 kernel... so would this be the
correct kernel-image?:

kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.6.8 on
PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV.



If you'd run it in 32bit mode, yes. Since it's a dual processor, get
the SMP-enabled kernel

If you're to run it in 64bit mode, you'd need to get the kernel
compiled with amd64-generic/ em64t  support (preferrably the
SMP-enabled ones), then use the debian-amd64 port.







--
Simon Buchanan

Tel: +64 21 348884
Eml: simon@networker.co.nz



Reply to: