On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 12:07:46AM +0100, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:58:05PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
> > > >>>Is that an answer to my question?
> > > >>>
> > > >>Raquel, I don't know if you are aware of the fact that any
> > > >answer>that you get in this list is coming from good willing
> > > >people that>charge nothing for sharing with all whatever they
> > > >know (and have>time to write about).
> > > >>
> > > >Really? I hadn't the faintest notion.
> > > >
> > > Well, let's keep it that way.
> > >
> > > By all means -- the great conspiracy to not answer your question
> > > should continue!
> >
> > Just to show that I'm onboard, I'll not answer my question either!
>
> Excuse me, is this the five minute or the thirty minute argument?
It depends, which did you sign up for. Try the other mailing list :-)
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature