Re: konqueror and supported protocols
This has already been reported as bug #281181 on 14/11/2004
Hopefully it will be resolved soon.
Curt-
On Thursday 18 November 2004 07:45, Zácek Krystof was heard to say:
> To the kio_smb problem:
> ===================
>
> The problem is caused by the library /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1
> having unresolved symbols:
>
> ldd -r /usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1
> libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1
> (0xb7e78000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7e65000)
> libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7e50000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x4117b000)
> libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
> (0xb7e3b000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0xb7dd2000)
> libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0xb7db0000)
> libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0xb7dad000) libldap.so.2
> => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0xb7d78000) liblber.so.2 =>
> /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0xb7d6b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (0x41019000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
> libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0xb7d56000)
> libgnutls.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11 (0xb7cf0000)
> libtasn1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2 (0xb7cdf000)
> libgcrypt.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0xb7c92000)
> libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0
> (0xb7c8e000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4161f000)
> undefined symbol: secrets_fetch_machine_password
> (/usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1)
> undefined symbol: secrets_fetch (/usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1)
> undefined symbol: secrets_delete
> (/usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1) undefined symbol: secrets_store
> (/usr/lib/libsmbclient.so.0.1)
>
> Therefore it cannot be loaded by the klauncher. This library is
> provided by the package libsmbclient. The current version of the
> package in unstable is 3.0.8-1.
>
> The workaround is downgrading to libsmbclient. 3.0.7-2. A bugreport
> should be filed against the libsmbclient 3.0.8-1 package.
>
> Regards,
>
> Krystof
--
September 11th, 2001
The proudest day for gun control and central
planning advocates in American history
Reply to: