Re: route takes long time to give the table
--- "H. S." <greatexcalibur@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sergio Basurto Juarez wrote:
>
> >>Ah. Thanks for the explanation. I am connecting to
> >>my ISP through ADSL
> >>modem (that x.y.z.z was my IP at that time). So
> from
> >>your explanation
> >>the problem could be at their end?
> >>
> >>->HS
> >
> >
> > Yes, I think so, nevertheless you can test this if
> you
> > setup a bind9 server as a caching only name
> server,
> > and the response from route -n should be faster
> than
> > the one you have right now.
> >
> > Extending the explanation:
> > Also if you have a private network and route try
> to
> > resolve the ip's from your private network to
> names,
> > then the problem comes becuase your ISP does not
> map
> > your private ip's to names, and that's why it
> takes
> > too much time. Then if you have a private network
> I
> > recommend you set up a caching only server, and
> > resolve your ip's to names, you do not need a
> public
> > domain, but you must have a line in your
> named.conf
> > like
> >
> > notify no;
> >
> > in order to don't get other servers confused with
> the
> > private domain that you will use. Also you can map
> > your ip's just to names like 192.168.0.1
> correspond to
> > alex_arc for example.
> >
> > You can get a much better picture of all with the
> > DNS-HOWTO and also recommend you to read the RFC's
> > that comes in the HOWTO (Just for fun).
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > =====
> > --
> > Sergio Basurto J.
>
>
>
> Yes, I do have a private network with machines on
> 192.168.0.x (total 4
> machines actually). Doesn't having all their IPs and
> their names in my
> /etc/hosts file help in my case? Or shouldn't it?
>
> ->HS
>
Yes more easy, if you only have 4 machines it would
help.
Regards.
=====
--
Sergio Basurto J.
If I have seen further it is by standing on the
shoulders of giants. (Isaac Newton)
--
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
Reply to: