On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:45:10AM +0000, Dave Ewart wrote: > I disagree. Woody is perfectly usable for most purposes. I accept > there may be some instances where features provided by newer versions of > some software is essential, but many new versions can be backported. At which point it really isn't Woody any more. -- Carl Fink carl@fink.to Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading http://www.jabootu.com