Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
From: Mark Roach <mrroach@okmaybe.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:37:15 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 1091806635.14754.9.camel@flmrroach.okmaybe.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1091805904.14754.6.camel@flmrroach.okmaybe.com>
References: <[🔎] 87hdrivzuk.fsf@scabbers.bignachos.com> <[🔎] 20040806011853.GA13288@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 1091805904.14754.6.camel@flmrroach.okmaybe.com>

On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:25 -0400, Mark Roach wrote:
> Have you used the imap headercache patch for mutt? I have used this on

I should really read the whole thread before posting noise... and
probably shouldn't have sent this one at all...

-Mark

Reply to:

References:
- [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
  - From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
- Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
  - From: Mark Roach <mrroach@okmaybe.com>

Prev by Date: libpng security vulnerability: lots of apps that display pngs don't use libpng
Next by Date: Postfix with SASL and TLS support in Sarge (and Sid)
Previous by thread: Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
Next by thread: Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread