Problems with SID, postfix 2.1.1, amavis after update
I use these debs:
postfix 2.1.1-3
amavisd-new 20030616p7-3
--------------------------------
main.cf
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
--------------------------------
master.cf
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 smtp
-o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200
-o disable_dns_lookups=yes
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=
-o local_recipient_maps=
-o relay_recipient_maps=
-o smtpd_restriction_classes=
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=
-o smtpd_helo_restrictions=
-o smtpd_sender_restrictions=
-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8
-o strict_rfc821_envelopes=yes
--------------------------------
everything works great using postfix 2.0.19 (the last deb in
unstable after the release of 2.1.1) and after the update
i get the following errors:
warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtp: bad command startup -- throttling
Jun 6 17:30:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[3066]: warning: premature
end-of-input on private/smtp-amavis socket while reading input
attribute name
Jun 6 17:30:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[3066]: warning:
private/smtp-amavis socket: malformed response
Jun 6 17:30:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[3066]: warning: transport
smtp-amavis failure -- see a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile
record for the problem description
.
.
.
Jun 5 06:31:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[827]: 3B31BD6DC0:
to=<jochen@localhost>, orig_to=<jochen>, relay=none, delay=73996,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: unknown mail
transport error)
Jun 5 06:31:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[827]: 31AF8D6DD3:
to=<jochen@localhost>, orig_to=<jochen>, relay=none, delay=73994,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: unknown mail
transport error)
Jun 5 06:31:30 laptopjkt postfix/qmgr[827]: 335BED6DE6:
to=<jochen@localhost>, orig_to=<jochen>, relay=none, delay=73993,
status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: unknown mail
transport error)
when I remove the this line
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
everything works fine again!
any suggestions?
--
Jochen Kaechelin
Reply to: