[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

resolves all non-existent address to my local host



Hi

My debian box (woody) resolves all non-existent hostnames to the local
host. I find this to be strange behaviour and it should not happen.

Please help me correct this issue.

for example, for some non-existent host named asdasdlkajd

$ host asdasdlkajd
Host asdasdlkajd not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

as you can see, it says there is no asdasdlkajd (dig says the same), but
when i ping it:

$ ping -c 1 asdasdlkajd
PING minerva0.redcetus.com (200.87.125.196): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 200.87.125.196: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.0 ms

--- minerva0.redcetus.com ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.0/0.0/0.0 ms

How could this be happening?

These are some of my files

$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1

$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1       localhost
200.87.125.196  minerva minerva.redcetus.com

# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
# (added automatically by netbase upgrade)

::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhosts

$ cat /etc/host.conf
order hosts,bind
multi on
spoofalert on

Some package versions:
ii  net-tools      1.60-4
ii  libc6          2.2.5-11.5
ii  bind9          9.2.1-2.woody
ii  ifupdown       0.6.4-4
ii  netkit-ping    0.10-9

Thanks in advance
please reply to this address: marcelo@redcetus.com
-- 
Marcelo Morales <marcelo@redcetus.com>
Red Cetus S.R.L.




------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTA DE REDCETUS S.R.L. : La información contenida en este E-mail y sus anexos, sólo puede ser utilizada por el individuo o la compañía a la cual está dirigido. Si no es el receptor autorizado, cualquier retención, difusión, distribución o copia de este mensaje es prohibida y sancionada por la ley. Si por error recibe este mensaje, favor reenviarlo y borrar el mismo

Reply to: