[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Problem gone (Re: aptitude/apt: "could not lock the cache file")



Well, I never did figure out the problem, and a reboot didn't help, but
updating the package list in aptitude seemed to "fix" it.  Whatever.


On 2004-04-12, Monique Y. Mudama penned:
> Argh!  Not sure what's going on here.
>
> I fire up aptitude, hit 'g' to look at what's about to be
> installed/removed/whatever, hit 'g' again, download completes[1], and:
>
>                 Apt errors W: Warning: could not lock the cache file.
>                 Opening in read-only mode [ Ok ]
>
>
> Well, that's a bummer.  I don't have any apt or dpkg related process
> running ... and besides, it doesn't actually say it couldn't get a
> lock file; it says it couldn't lock the cache file, which seems like a
> different statement entirely?  I did nuke the following:
>
> rm /var/cache/apt/archives/lock rm /var/lib/aptitude/lock rm
> /var/lib/dpkg/lock rm /var/lib/apt/lists/lock
>
> based on this link: 
>
><http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-user@lists.debian.org/msg92551.html>
>
> ... no effect.
>
> I'm guessing fuser would be helpful here, if I knew the name of the
> cache file.  I tried `fuser /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin` and got no
> output.
>
> The bug lists for aptitude and apt don't seem to be pertinent,
> although there are enough bugs listed in the apt package that I might
> have missed something.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> [1] Download is actually empty, as I updated my package list about a
> week ago.  The theory is that I can let packages sit on the server for
> a few days and then see if any new bugs have been filed before I
> actually update my system with these new packages.  Also, I'm sucking
> packages down through apt-cacher, not that I would think it matters.
>


-- 
monique



Reply to: