Re: branding debian releases
On 14 Apr 2004, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
>
[snip]
> My understanding of the 'testing' distribution is in conflict with your
> description. Testing is the last to receive security updates, and I
> believe it is more prone to wide-ranging package bugs than is unstable.
> I see it more as a developer sandbox than a live distribution.
>
> Am I wrong?
>
I don't know, but I hope so! :)
I have to admit to keeping up to date with testing for well over a year,
but lacking the courage to make more than occasional forays into
unstable. But if you are right, perhaps I ought to change my policy.
Anthony
--
ac@acampbell.org.uk || http://www.acampbell.org.uk
using Linux GNU/Debian || for book reviews, electronic
Windows-free zone || books and skeptical articles
Reply to: