Re: fvwm and post.hook problem

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: fvwm and post.hook problem
From: hugo vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 07:12:46 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] c563vk$649$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4c9cd043b0sbellon@sbellon.de>
References: <1ILwi-1Ez-57@gated-at.bofh.it> <1ILwi-1Ez-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <1ILwi-1Ez-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <1INo9-3eV-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <[🔎] 4c9cd043b0sbellon@sbellon.de>

Stefan Bellon wrote:

hugo vanwoerkom wrote:

Stefan Bellon wrote:

hugo vanwoerkom wrote:



[snip]

Unless someone knows this, my only solution is to subscribe to themailinglist and ask :-(
Which mailing list?

http://www.fvwm.org/contact/



I don't see how the upstream FVWM mailing lists could help me with a
problem of the packaging of the latest Debian FVWM package.

You know for sure that it is packaging problem and not an upstreamchange? What does the changelog say?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: fvwm and post.hook problem
  - From: Stefan Bellon <sbellon@sbellon.de>