[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LICENSE/ SERIAL NUMBERS for INSTALLATION



on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 08:27:35AM -0500, Stephen Touset (stephen@touset.org) wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 03:31, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Stephen Touset <stephen@touset.org> writes:
> > 
> > > I've seen bullshit legal boilerplate on emails from a lot of small
> > > companies (including those from the CEO of a company I work for), and I
> > > can't help but giggle at how silly the whole premise is.
> > 
> > Ever explain it to them why it's so silly?
> 
> Yes, actually. Unfortunately, the only response I've ever gotten is
> something akin to, "Every other executive (of small companies that never
> seem to go anywhere) does it. It's an industry standard."
> 
> The argument that it's literally 100% bullshit and not binding in any
> way (just because you say it's illegal to read the email doesn't
> actually mean it is) seems to be completely lost on them. I haven't yet
> tried the approach of telling them what kind of impression it gives
> others, though.

I've recently added a header specifically rejecting email disclaimers.

<sigh>


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    Save Bob Edwards!  http://www.savebobedwards.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: