Re: Question re Debian versions

[Michael Satterwhite <michael@weblore.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 19 March 2004 18:17, Monique Y. Herman wrote:

> I wasn't claiming that unstable is a better choice than stable for, er,
> stability; I was claiming it was a better choice than testing.

I understood you, but I asked the original question. I think that I had it 
more in context.

I believe the discussion moved on to "how things work". I've found that 
extremely helpful, too. I needed to know how the versions progressed in 
Debian, too. Thanks to all of you who helped with this. I appreciate it much.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAXFhqjeziQOokQnARAtbmAJ999mJte0EM3GCCY9ovKobJsvpCkwCgr/MP
22K6g6bC21sIVLNI38Ms61o=
=4cl6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----