Re: eterm font brighter ?
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 05:47, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure whether this an eterm config or bash config.
> I have trouble reading the eterm font used, I can make it larger but it
> looks lousy, I just want it brighter.
>
> Does anyone know how to make the font brighter for eterm ? (and make it
> permanent)
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Ross.
Edit your menus. Man Eterm.
eg (the two last lines are on one line):
ken@pingu:ken$> cat /home/ken/.enlightenment/file.menu
"User Menus"
"User Application list" NULL menu "user_apps.menu"
"KDE" NULL exec "kde.menu"
"GNOME" NULL menu "gnome.menu"
"GNOME User Menu" NULL exec "gnome_user.menu"
"Enlightenment Epplets" NULL menu "epplets.menu"
"Restart Enlightenment" NULL exec "/usr/bin/eesh -e 'restart'"
"Log Out" NULL exec "/usr/bin/eesh -e 'exit'"
"Eterm" NULL exec "Eterm -t BlueSteel"
"Eterm-bakgrunn" NULL exec "Eterm -P
Daughter.jpg@100x100:propscaled --default-font-index 3"
ken@pingu:ken$>
Kenneth
>
> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may
> be privileged and confidential, and are intended only for the use of the
> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or responsible for
> delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any use, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any attachments is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please REPLY TO the
> SENDER to advise the error AND then DELETE the e-mail from your system.
> Any views expressed in this e-mail and any files transmitted with
> it are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
> states them to be the views of our organisation.
> Our organisation does not represent or warrant that
> the attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The user
> assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
> indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the liability to
> our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the attached files or the
> cost of having the attached files resupplied.
>
Reply to: