[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libxft-dev problem



Have you find any solution ... ? same trouble here ... :o(

Thanks !

Le vendredi 12 Mars 2004 17:24, quirin a écrit :
> during apt-get upgrade i encountered the following problem with
> libxft2-dev. (i use sid)
>
> bigfatmama:/home/quirin/tmp# apt-get upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   libxft-dev: Depends: libxft2 (= 2.1.2-5) but 2.1.2-6 is installed
> E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f
>
> using the -f option show the following unsatisfying output
>
> bigfatmama:/home/quirin/tmp# apt-get -f install
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Correcting dependencies... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   libxft-dev
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   libxft-dev
> 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
> 35 not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0B/60.2kB of archives.
> After unpacking 4096B disk space will be freed.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Y
> (Reading database ... 191853 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5
> (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ...
> diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
> to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev
> Removing `diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h
> to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev'
> dpkg-divert: rename involves overwriting `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h'
> with
>   different file `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h', not allowed
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
>  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> so far i wasn't able to fix this problem on my computer. does anyone have
> an idea how to deal with that?

-- 
Bill Footcow



Reply to: