[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mixing stable and testing



On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:31:24PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote:
> >>I obviously want to track stable (since this server needs to be
> >>secure), but there are a few packages that I want from testing or
> >>unstable.  How to do this?
Hi Dave,
from those at debian-on-high, it is recommended to follow your tract.
On stable, which is the recommended one for production systems, is known
to be 'a bit old', you have 2 good optinons:
backports and source.
backports is a unofficial site that makes debs of certain popular (admin)
packages.
then there is the debian source packages.
the idea that both of these is to compile a package against stable
libraries to produce something that can be installed on a stable system
and not require you to install testing or unstable debs which would
require you to upgrade the dependencies to testing/unstable deb and thus
mess with you stable system.

> >
> >
> >This message from the recent archives should be helpful:
> >
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200401/msg06198.html
> 
> IIUC, that messages describes how to install binary packages.  In fact, 
> the whole thread seemed to focus on that.  The Debian Reference (section 
> 6.4.10) suggests that it's better to compile from source packages, so you 
> don't end up upgrading libc, for example.  Is this really true?

HTH
-Kev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: