On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:04:59 -0400
Jeff Elkins <jeffelkins@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I used spamc < ./$1 | grep '^X-Spam' and it identified an obvious piece of
> spam, and my emails now contain: Received: from mail by elkins.org with
> spam-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
Your stats on mail processed is also going to double. If you're feeling
brave try updating to Exim4 and give SA-Exim a whirl. Only a single delivery
per message and much finer control over what happens to the message. :)
> Much more to learn here for both exim and spamassassin...next I want to
> route any html email or mail with attachments to a spam bucket account.
Bad idea. You'll note my message has an attachment on it. According to
some recent stats so do about 30% of this list. Attachments are a tool. Like
any tool they can be used properly or improperly. Let SA's Bayesian filters
figure out which instead of making a improper blanket rule.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpauhbJLsWBg.pgp
Description: PGP signature