Re: why sign email

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why sign email
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:08:04 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87oez5w5i3.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030804194509.GA4156@pooq.com> (hashi@pooq.com's message of "Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:45:09 -0400")
References: <20030731235730.GA1481@earthlink.net> <[🔎] 20030803041325.GD14726@ganymede> <[🔎] 8765lezxvg.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <[🔎] 20030803220253.GF14726@ganymede> <[🔎] 873cghxxex.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <[🔎] 20030804194509.GA4156@pooq.com>

At 2003-08-04T19:45:09Z, hashi@pooq.com writes:

> Please refer me to it.  Or post it, even.

From Karsten's page:

    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Rants/gpg-signed-mail.html


-- 
Kirk Strauser

Attachment: pgpnqoE0WMl3C.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at these update from M$ Corporation.)
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
- Re: why sign email
  - From: hashi@pooq.com

Prev by Date: Re: --purge when package already gone ?
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o
Previous by thread: Re: why sign email
Next by thread: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at these update from M$ Corporation.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread