Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
- To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Linux firewall vs Windows and Hardware based firewalls
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 03:48:04 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030801104803.GD8002@ursine.ca>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20030731182123.GA735@ping>
- References: <96F38967F729284A8B6A2CE70CF09A09150871@datcom-exchange.datcom_ho.local> <20030731205021.73a93433.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> <1059660405.7508.472.camel@haggis> <20030731182123.GA735@ping>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 01:21:23PM -0500, Jesse Meyer wrote:
> Because of such concerns, for small networks, I would recommend a
> low-end x86 machine with a stripped down install of linux - basically,
> iptables and ssh. For complicated routing, you'll need to bite the
> bullet and buy a high-end router, which can easily end up costing tens
> of thousands of dollars. (But if you are asking what you need in this
> mailing list, odds are you don't need a complicated router.)
Actually, iptables can do a whole lot more than what IOS can do from
what I've seen...
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/KkVjJ5vLSqVpK2kRAiYKAKCy0CHERmW0SXEoyfOowv4CBbL3uQCg4W8J
4mWU9AJ4OnBwZS0wPvY+81g=
=vBbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: