Thanks, David! Solved the problem... Bruno. On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 11:58, David Z Maze wrote: > Bruno Diniz de Paula <diniz@cs.rutgers.edu> writes: > > > I'm writting a program that deals with some kernel structures (defined > > on the kernel source includes), as well as with some definitions from > > libc6-dev under asm/... and linux/... The problem is that some of the > > symbols are duplicated and, what is worse, with different definitions. > > What would be a solution for this? > > Set the include path for your compiler to explicitly include the > kernel headers you care about. > (-I/home/dmaze/src/kernel-source-2.4.20, or some such) > > > I mean, why glibc also defines something that is strictly related to > > the kernel itself? I thought that everything inside libc6 concerning > > kernel stuff was taken directly from the kernel source includes > > instead of redeclared... > > See /usr/share/doc/libc6/README.Debian.gz. > > -- > David Maze dmaze@debian.org http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ > "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." > -- Abra Mitchell -- Bruno Diniz de Paula <diniz@cs.rutgers.edu> Rutgers University
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part