[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: X configuration problem



On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 01:11, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:31:07AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 02:59, bernard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I have just installed Debian 3.0. The PC is equipped with an ASUS V7100 
> > > graphics card (based on a nVidia GeForce2 MX chipset). I use an ordinary 15" 
> > > monitor.
> > > 
> > > When starting the X server, I receive the following error message :
> > > (EE) Screens(s) found, but none have a usable configuration
> > > 
> > > I guess that the problem is due to a configuration error in 
> > > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 (to be found hereunder)
> > > 
> > > I tried to restart X with different values for the DefaultDepth parameter but 
> > > with no success...
> > > 
> > > Some hints would be greatly appreciated...
> > > 
> > [snip]
> > > Section "Device"
> > >         Identifier      "Generic Video Card"
> > >         Driver          "nv"
> > >         Option          "UseFBDev"              "true"
> > > EndSection
> > 
> > I'm 99.44% sure that Nvidia doesn't "do" the frame buffer.  Try this:
> > 
> >   Section "Device"
> >         Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> >         Driver     "nv"
> >         BusID      "AGP:01:00:0"  # use lspci to adjust to your system 
> >         VideoRam   32768  # because I have 32768KB RAM
> >   EndSection
> 
> I'm pretty sure that X (n x86, anyway) can detect the BusID and VideoRAM
> itself.

Really?  I'd never heard that.  Back when I used xf86config, it didn't
detect video ram and bux ID.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA      http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|                                                               |
| The purpose of the military isn't to pay your college tuition |
| or give you a little extra income; it's to "kill people and   |
| break things".  Surprisingly, not everyone understands that.  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+



Reply to: