[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Complaint



--text follows this line--
>>>>> In article <[🔎] 3E5DA55B.1070900@charter.net>, Joseph A Nagy Jr
>>>>> <joseph_a_nagy_jr@charter.net> writes: 

 > Actually, that Reply-to-list functionality can be implimented on
 > the list itself.

	Not without breaking the original functionality of Reply to

 >   Why list-masters don't do this is so far beyond me

	You should google for Reply to considered harmful to see the
 argument for that position.

 > that I don't even bother asking anymore (or complaining about it
 > when I have to fix it myself (by hitting reply all, removing the to
 > (which is the person who sent the message to whom I'm replying) and
 > changing the list from CC to to (very easy, but extra work we
 > shouldn't have to do)).

	You need a better MUA.

	manoj
-- 
 Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: