Re: [OT] Re: shuttle disaster
Mike M wrote:
>
> On Monday 03 February 2003 18:38, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> > Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > > ...
> > > In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be
> > > _teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less,
> > > because passing civilization along from one generation to the next
> > > ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone
> > > could have. - Lee Iacocca
> >
> > Wouldn't that be society resting on its laurels? And stagnating?
> > (With no one creating additional civilization.)
>
> Socrates was stagnant and resting on his society's laurels? Good teaching
> inspires creativity.
I didn't say Socrates was stagnant.
I didn't say teachers were stagnant.
No, I said (well...meant) that society would be stagnant if passing on
knowledge were the _only_ highest aspiration. Someone's got to be
creating/discovering/generating new knowldge or the pool of knowledge
doesn't grow.
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
dsb@smart.net
Reply to: