[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

LIST ADMIN (was Re: FW: Authorization Request Declined)



Can this crap be stopped?

Raquel

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:26:28 -0800
"Sreelal Chandrasenan" <SChandrasenan@verance.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergio Flores (PACE Anti-Piracy Support)
> [mailto:support@paceap.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: Dean Angelico
> Cc: Sreelal Chandrasenan; Mike Petka; Dave Ross
> Subject: RE: Authorization Request Declined
> 
> 
> Dear Dean,
> 
> Please have Mike Petka send in another authorization request as
> his previous attempt is no longer valid.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Sergio Flores
> PACE Anti-Piracy Support
> support@paceap.com
> http://www.paceap.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Angelico [mailto:DAngelico@verance.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:23 PM
> To: support@paceap.com
> Cc: Sreelal Chandrasenan; Mike Petka; Dave Ross
> Subject: FW: Authorization Request Declined
> 
> 
> Please authorize Mike Petka, a new employee of Verance. He is our
> group lead of Data Systems Infrastructure, systems administration,
> and needs to periodically authorize the Pace Interlok server
> during server rebuilds, installs, etc.
> 
> 	Full Name: Mike Petka
> 	Email: mpetka@verance.com
> 	Phone: 858-202-2972
> Thanks
> Dean
> 
> Dean Angelico
> Vice President, Engineering
> dangelico@verance.com
> Verance
> 10145 Pacific Heights Blvd., Suite 200
> San Diego, CA  92121
> (858) 202-2800
> Fax:   202-2801
> www.verance.com
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Sreelal Chandrasenan  
> Sent:	Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:28 PM
> To:	Dean Angelico
> Subject:	FW: Authorization Request Declined
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sergio Flores (PACE Anti-Piracy Support)
> [mailto:support@paceap.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:36 PM
> To:	Sreelal Chandrasenan
> Cc:	Mike Petka
> Subject:	Authorization Request Declined
> 
> 
> Dear Sreelal,
> 
> We received a license request today from mpetka@verance.com from a
> person named Mike Petka.  We do not have your permission to
> authorize this person to use InterLok and therefore there is no
> such person on file in our database of authorized InterLok
> personnel at your business. Could you please let us know if we
> should provide this authorization? Please provide full name and
> email so that we can add this to the database. I hope that you
> understand that PACE takes authorization generation very seriously
> these days. Not only is it important for us to make sure that
> access to our tools is limited to our customers, PACE is also now
> a certificate authority with regards to authorizing our tools.
> That means when we generate a license, we are also generating a
> certificate that identifies our customers from a cryptographic
> standpoint. It's very important that we only provide this kind of
> identity proof to valid customers.  As I am sure you are aware,
> access to InterLok can allow for authorizations to be delivered
> and thus must be controlled by your company Policies; much in the
> same way source code access is. Our goal is to provide the best
> security that we can. I hope that you understand this need and
> that you will be patient with any delays that may occur in our
> process when we cannot validate your employees in our customer
> database. Please let us know if you have any questions.  Upon
> response we will update our data to reflect the changes required. 
> Should you need to review all of the users from your company
> currently in our database, please let us know and we will be happy
> to send you this list so that you can update it. Regards,
> 
> Pace Anti-Piracy Tech Support
> support@paceap.com
> http://www.paceap.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 


--
Raquel
============================================================
All the beautiful sentiments in the world weigh less than a single
lovely action.
  --James Russell Lowell



Reply to: