Re: Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?
From: Travis Crump <pretzalz@techhouse.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:27:54 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 3FDB5A2A.50004@techhouse.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031213161708.GA8253@comcast.net>
References: <[🔎] 20031213161708.GA8253@comcast.net>

Nunya wrote:

On my machine:

# update-alternatives --display x-www-browser
x-www-browser - status is auto.
 link currently points to /usr/bin/konqueror
/usr/bin/konqueror - priority 100
Current `best' version is /usr/bin/konqueror.

But:
$ grep-available -FProvides x-www-browser
<nothing>

Why is konqeror my x-www-browser when it doesn't "Provide" it?

See<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200312/msg01165.html>

Attachment: pgpzdKvXqC9V6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?
  - From: Nunya <31210.nospam@comcast.net>

References:
- Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?
  - From: Nunya <31210.nospam@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in testing abiword package?
Next by Date: Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
Previous by thread: Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?
Next by thread: Re: Why is konqueror my x-www-browser when it doesn't provide it?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread