Re: No need for 2.4.23 (re compromise)
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:20:28PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 07:47:47 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > kernel-source-2.4.20 - Linux kernel source for version 2.4.20 with
> > Debian patches
> > I'm using that last one, 2.4.20.
> But I don't think it has been fixed, as there is no version from
> the security updates:
> greux:~> apt-show-versions kernel-source-2.4.20 -a
> kernel-source-2.4.20 install ok not-installed
> No stable version
> kernel-source-2.4.20 2.4.20-11 testing
> kernel-source-2.4.20 2.4.20-11 unstable
> kernel-source-2.4.20 not installed
Oh, So maybe 2.4.20 source is not in stable after all. I'm not clear
why apt-cache search is listing kernel-source-2.4.20:
>From the manual:
search search performs a full text search on all available package
files for the regex pattern given.
I assumed "available" meant the packages available via the listings in
sources.list. But trying apt-cache search kernel-source-2.4.20 on
another "Stable" machine with the same source.list returns nothing. So
I guess "available" includes packages manually installed.
Hum, I cannot remember installing that package, although it is
ii kernel-source-2 2.4.20-8 Linux kernel source for version 2.4.20 with De
my notes for the machine show I used
so much for taking good notes. I must have had some problem with the
kernel.org version and just copied the package from a Sid machine.
Time to try out 2.4.23 from kernel.org.