Re: odd df results
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 22:52, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> Quoting Jeffrey L. Taylor <jeff@austinblues.dyndns.org>:
> > Quoting Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:44, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > > Quoting Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>:
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:14, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > > > > > I am getting the following result on my filesystem. How do I correct
> > > > > > it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # df
> > > > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > > > > > /dev/hda1 -1006130973579 1 0 24% /
> > > > > > /dev/hda2 -1006139352819 1 0 8% /home
> > > > >
> > > > > Woody? Sarge, what?
> > > > >
> > > > > How big is /dev/hda?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Woody: fileutils 4.1-10
> > > >
> > > > /dev/hda is approximately 8.9GB
> > > >
> > > > # df -Hi
> > > > Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
> > > > /dev/hda1 489k 53k 436k 11% /
> > > > /dev/hda2 489k 11k 478k 3% /home
> > >
> > > How big is the complete /dev/hda?
> > >
> > > I'm using fileutils 5.0-5 from testing, and it handles a 120GB
> > > /dev/hda perfectly:
> > > $ df
> > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > > /dev/hda3 7874560 161148 7313396 3% /
> > > /dev/hda2 46668 2871 41388 7% /boot
> > > /dev/hda5 7874528 2264344 5210168 31% /usr
> > > /dev/hda6 7874528 1088952 6385560 15% /var
> > > /dev/hda7 7874528 561168 6913344 8% /home
> > > /dev/hda8 87953148 1152008 86801140 2% /data
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Not particularly big, approx. 8.9GB. That's what's surprising.
> >
> > I may try the testing fileutils if the dependencies don't break
> > everything.
> >
> > Jeffrey
> >
> >
>
> Whatever it is, it is not limited to df. When I try and run amanda
> from another computer, backing up this machine, I get this error:
>
> ERROR: maelstorm: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.]
>
> maelstorm is the Debian machine. The AMANDA server is a SuSE machine.
Maybe an fsck is in order?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA
Some former UNSCOM officials are alarmed, however. Terry Taylor,
a British senior UNSCOM inspector from 1993 to 1997, says the
figure of 95 percent disarmament is "complete nonsense because
inspectors never learned what 100 percent was. UNSCOM found a
great deal and destroyed a great deal, but we knew [Iraq's] work
was continuing while we were there, and I'm sure it continues,"
says Mr. Taylor, now head of the Washington
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0829/p01s03-wosc.html
Reply to: