[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Abiword in testing unusable



On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:32:51PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 20:25, Carl Fink wrote:

> > Same thing as you, as I quoted above.  So what's apt-get trying to
> > install?
> 
> Dunno.  Show us the whole command + all messages.


Okay, here's what happens with abiword proper:

    nitpicking:/home/carlf/News/video# apt-get install abiword
    Reading Package Lists... Done
    Building Dependency Tree... Done
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
    requested an impossible situation or if you are using the
    unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been
    created or been moved out of Incoming.

    Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely
    likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
    that package should be filed.
    The following information may help to resolve the situation:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
      abiword: Depends: libperl5.6 (>= 5.6.1-8.3) but 5.6.1-8.2 is to
    be installed
    E: Broken packages

And with abiword-GTK:

    nitpicking:/home/carlf/News/video# apt-get install abiword-GTK
    Reading Package Lists... Done
    Building Dependency Tree... Done
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
    requested an impossible situation or if you are using the
    unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been
    created or been moved out of Incoming.

    Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely
    likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
    that package should be filed.
    The following information may help to resolve the situation:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
      abiword-gtk: Depends: libpspell4 (>= 0.12.2-5) but it is not
    going to be installed
                   Depends: abiword-common (= 1.0.2+cvs.2002.06.05-1)
    but 2.0.0+cvs.2003.09.25-0jds1 is to be installed
    E: Broken packages

Thanks for the effort, Ron.
-- 
Carl Fink             carl@fink.to        
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http://www.jabootu.com



Reply to: