Re: ProFTPd over NAT

To: Greg Bolshaw <greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>, Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ProFTPd over NAT
From: Christian Jaeger <christian.jaeger@ethlife.ethz.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:53:37 +0200
Message-id: <p04320415bbadd775bf12@[192.168.3.11]>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200310110023.02115.greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>
References: <[🔎] 200310102229.27749.greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk> <[🔎] 200310102248.02691.greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk> <[🔎] 20031010145156.045e9ce1.grey@dmiyu.org> <[🔎] 200310110023.02115.greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>

At 0:23 Uhr +0200 11.10.2003, Greg Bolshaw wrote:

Yeah. Surely there must be something I can do with ProFTPd to force it to use
my public IP?


MasqueradeAddress 1.2.3.4

- Chj.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ProFTPd over NAT
  - From: Greg Bolshaw <greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>

References:
- ProFTPd over NAT
  - From: Greg Bolshaw <greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>
- Re: ProFTPd over NAT
  - From: Greg Bolshaw <greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>
- Re: ProFTPd over NAT
  - From: Steve Lamb <grey@dmiyu.org>
- Re: ProFTPd over NAT
  - From: Greg Bolshaw <greg@linuxtechnologies.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Licensing requirements ???
Next by Date: Re: Licensing requirements ???
Previous by thread: Re: ProFTPd over NAT
Next by thread: Re: ProFTPd over NAT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread