[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Stable? Unstable?

* KRF (ken1@interparse.com) [031007 17:22]:
> On the advice of some compadres I have ordered the 7 CD package so that I can 
> try Debian.  I currently run RH 7.x  and 9 and was griping about RedHat 
> always moving stuff from to some oddball location and having to reregister 
> every thirty days to use their site.
> I have been trying to follow this listserv but a lot of the stuff doesn't mean 
> much since I have no Debian context to hang it on - yet.
> I keep seeing references to 'Stable' and 'Unstable" and was wondering which 
> version I ordered.  Obviously, being a newbie to Debian I hope I ordered 
> 'Stable.'   No, I haven't googled yet for anything since the company's 
> network is still locked down as the poor Bloatware dudes (BSCE's???) try to 
> get everybody cranked back up and out of the worm farm:) :) :)
> Anyway, can anybody give me a short blurb on what specifically is which?


good times,
int main() {
    puts("Reader! Think not that \n"
         "technical information \n"
         "ought not be called speech;");
    return 0;

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: