Re: Openoffice install in sid (/usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict)
Have you tried "apt-get -f install"? If so, what did that return, any
errors?
It seems that the script is missing some directory in /usr/lib.
I did an apt-get dist-upgrade on my unstable today and had no trouble
whatsoever.
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 21:40, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Life with Sid -- dist-upgrade trying to update Openoffice.org:
>
> moseley@laptop:~$ cd /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict
> -bash: cd: /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict: No such file or directory
>
> moseley@laptop:~$ ls /usr/lib/openoffice/share/
> autocorr basic dtd gallery psprint registry wordbook
> autotext config fonts icons readme template
>
>
>
> laptop:/home/moseley# apt-get dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... Done
> The following packages have been kept back
> audacity eterm gaim sox vorbis-tools
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
> 2 not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0B of archives.
> After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Setting up openoffice.org-debian-files (1.0.99+1.1rc3-3) ...
> /usr/share/openoffice.org-debian-files/hooks/postinst.d/ooo_link: line 6: cd: /usr/lib/openoffice/share/dict: No such file or directory
> run-parts: /usr/share/openoffice.org-debian-files/hooks/postinst.d/ooo_link exited with return code 1
> dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-debian-files (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org:
> openoffice.org depends on openoffice.org-debian-files (>= 1.0.99+1.1rc3); however:
> Package openoffice.org-debian-files is not configured yet.
> dpkg: error processing openoffice.org (--configure):
> dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> openoffice.org-debian-files
> openoffice.org
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Moseley
> moseley@hank.org
>
Reply to: