Re: SpamAssassin and false-negative spam
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 08:58, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:48:44AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 06:28, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=4.0
> > > tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
> > > REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,X_LOOP,
> > > X_MAILING_LIST
> > > autolearn=ham version=2.55
> > >
> > > (This is from your message)
> >
> > Nope.
>
> I meant it is how (my) spamassassin classified the message.
Yes, I know. I mean that I don't have anything like that in any
of my mails, neither ham nor spam. (But the spams get quarantined
and I get a SPAM FROM email from amavisd-new, so that doesn't bother
me.)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA
"Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse."
Larry Wall, 10/14/1998
Reply to: