Re: freqtweak bug?

[Tim Beauregard <helycos@lycos.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Colin Watson wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:01:31PM +0100, Tim Beauregard wrote:
|
|>Colin Watson wrote:
|>| On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 02:07:36PM +0100, Tim Beauregard wrote:
|>|>Is this a bug?
|>|>
|>|>tim@debian:~$ freqtweak
|>|>freqtweak: relocation error: freqtweak: symbol _ZTV10wxListBase, version
|>|>WXGTK_2.4 not defined in file libwx_gtk-2.4.so.0 with link time
reference
|>|>
|>|>I'm too newbie to tell if its them or us!
|>|
|>| A piece of advice, then: always give the version number of the affected
|>| package and the distribution of Debian you're running when reporting
|>| problems like this. They're very tedious to investigate otherwise.
|>
|>Apologies for that.
|>
|>Freqtweak version 0.5.2-1, compiled untouched from source.
|>libwxgtk2.4 version 2.4.1.2, from Debian archives.
|>
|>Running Debian 3.0r0 with some unstable libraries.
|
|
| That'd explain it. libwxgtk2.4 is a C++ library, and the C++ ABI has
| changed between stable and testing/unstable. If you're using C++
| libraries from testing/unstable that depend on libstdc++5, then you
| *must* compile code using them with g++ 3.2 or above. I'm guessing
| you're using g++ 2.95.
|
| Alternatively, you may be able to build libwxgtk2.4 from source; but it
| might be easier just to move wholesale to testing or unstable.
|
| Cheers,
|

Thank you for your advice Colin.  Looks like broadband wolves are
bashing down my door!

Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/XQMLsUUdIDHrdAURAuIIAJ9zEh9QK3LWC0FxiHULeboeDTuy1gCg3WTO
lqSxC9f5m8g1P3iF751KnjA=
=9ysp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----