[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Logging into X remotely



XDMCP works great.  Run XDM (or KDM, or GDM) on the Athlon.  Run "X -query 
host-or-ip-of-athlon".  Works great.  I've been doing this for over a year, 
for very similar reasons...

On Sunday 31 August 2003 17:45, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Sorry about not being very clear...
>
> I'm just trying to explain what I would like to do - the requirements I
> said earlier isn't set into stone - let me try again:
>
> I've got a 1.4GHz Athlon PC and a 100MHz 486 laptop.  I'd like the
> 100MHz laptop to "log in" and use the power of the Athlon rather than
> processing everything locally on the 486 - as much as possible would be
> nice.
>
> Cheers - Piers
>
> Carlos Sousa wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 04:19:42 -0700 Steve Lamb wrote:
> >>On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:16:00 +0100
> >>
> >>Carlos Sousa <csousa@tvtel.pt> wrote:
> >>>On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 04:06:39 -0700 Steve Lamb wrote:
> >>>>On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 11:42:09 +0100
> >>>>
> >>>>Piers Kittel <edinfo-list@biased.org> wrote:
> >>>>>Is it possible at all for X on a computer to log in another
> >>>>>computer remotely?
> >>>>
> >>>>    Yes.  Look into XDMCP.
> >>>
> >>>Another option would be VNC.
> >>
> >>    Not with the parameters he specified.  Eg local X server, no
> >>    remote X server.
> >
> > His post is not clear, but I think he means it the other way around
> > (parenthesis are mine):
> >
> >    I.e. one computer has XDM and WMaker on it, but without an XFree86
> >    server (the client?), another computer has a XFree86 server (the
> >    server?), the computer with WMaker on, logs on to the XFree86 and
> >    shows the XDM login dialog box (???), and then logs into the server,
> >    and see the whole display just as if it was on the other computer?
> >
> > It's not exactly clear what he means, though, but this business of
> > logging in to another computer's display is easily achievable with
> > VNC, even if he has to scrap his original requirement details,
> > whatever they were.
> >
> > Cheers,

-- 
David Corbin <dcorbin@machturtle.com>



Reply to: