[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: nfs problem



On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
> > Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> > mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> > receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
> > anything either, thats why I find it strange.
> 
> There have been some bugs in recent versions of nfs-kernel-server and/or
> nfs-common. Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
> downgrade to 1.0.3-1.

The same thing has happened to me.

On the client:

# ps aux |grep portmap
daemon  340  0.0  0.0  1316  396 ? S    Jul29   0:00 /sbin/portmap

#  ps aux |grep statd
root   2477  0.0  0.1  1372  680 ? S    10:19   0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd

# ps aux |grep lockd
root   2462  0.0  0.0     0    0 ? W   10:19   0:00 [lockd]

# dpkg -l | grep nfs
ii  nfs-common     1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve
ii  nfs-kernel-ser 1.0.3-2 Kernel NFS server support

# mount /nfs/music
mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused

On the server:

$ ps aux |grep portmap
daemon  272  0.0  0.0  1320  468 ? S  Jun25   0:00 [portmap]

me@haggis:~$ ps aux |grep statd
root    854  0.0  0.0  1372  680 ? S  Jul27   0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd

me@haggis:~$ ps aux |grep lockd
root    925  0.0  0.0     0    0 ? SW Jul27   0:00 [lockd]

$ dpkg -l | grep nfs
ii  nfs-common     1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve
ii  nfs-kernel-ser 1.0.3-2 Kernel NFS server support

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net             |
| Jefferson, LA  USA                                              |
|                                                                 |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian  |
|  because I hate vegetables!"                                    |
|    unknown                                                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+




Reply to: