[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Radius Server



Am I right in thinking that you then specify which accounts can login via
that radius server ?
Do they have to have user account on the box, or are they just uid/passwords
entries in a list ?

Any tricky stages when setting up ?

Thnaks

Matt

--


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken McCord [mailto:ken@themccords.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:34 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: Radius Server
> 
> 
> Just set one up two weeks ago using cistron-radiusd.  What do 
> you need help with?
> 
> Ken
> 
> On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 19:40, Joyce, Matthew wrote:
> > Has anyone setup a Radius server before using Debian ?
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joyce, Matthew
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 15 July 2003 11:56 AM
> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > > Subject: Radius Server
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dear Debian-User,
> > > 
> > > I use a Cisco vpn to connect to our office NT network.
> > > At the moment the vpn is setup to authenticate with the NT
> > > domain controllers.
> > > 
> > > I am wondering is anyone has implemented a Radius server on
> > > Debian which could be used for authentication ?
> > > 
> > > Can anyone offer any comments about using any of the following ?
> > > 
> > > radiusd-cistron - Radius server written by Cistron.
> > > radiusd-livingston - Remote Authentication Dial-In User 
> > > Service (RADIUS) server xtradius - Free radius server 
> > > implementation. yardradius - YARD Radius Auth/Acct Server
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > 
> > > Matt
> > > 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> > > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 




Reply to: