Re: NFS. [ Was: Re: nfs mount error ]

[Jon Haugsand <Jon-H.Haugsand@norges-bank.no>]

* Alvin Oga
> add soft to your mount options, so that the sytem can keep going
> vs using hard mount which waits for the remotefs to come back online
> 	- i rather use/risk soft mounts than to sit and wait
> 	in a hung state ... the pc is useless in that state anyway
>
> 	- and over the years, i've not seen any corruptions of files
> 	due to soft mounts ... lots of other problems though
> 	that is way worst than soft vs hard mount issues
>
> 	- and i only do soft mounts for my data, where i know its all
> 	saved and duplicated n-times elsewhere

Thanks.  Does this apply to smbfs too?

-- 
 Jon Haugsand, Jon-H.Haugsand@norges-bank.no
 http://www.norges-bank.no