[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Trying to connect a digital cam to my PC



J.F.Gratton wrote:

> I just bought an Olympus D520Z digital cam, and of course, it doesn't
> come with anything Linux-related. To transfer pictures from the cam to
> my PC I'd have to use Windows, which I'd like to avoid as much as
> possible.
> 
> Since in Windows my camera appears as a removable drive, I figured that
> I'd have to compile the usb-storage.o (USB mass storage device) module
> to get it working in linux, but as soon as I modprobe the module, it
> just hangs; the system is still responsive everywhere else, I just lose
> the console where I typed modprobe. All other USB-related modules are
> prealably loaded since my keyboard and mouse are USB-connected.
> 
> Is there something I miss or what ? Is there anybody else that uses that
> camera on linux ?

You might get faster answers to questions like these if you search Google
first. As it happens, "Olympus D520Z USB Linux" turns up the following
page as the very first result:

  http://software.jodda.de/camediac220.html

which explains that the D520Z, like many other Olympus cameras, has a
defective USB implementation that the Linux USB code doesn't handle
well. There is a workaround, but it involves making your computer
incompatible with other USB storage devices.

My daughter has another model of Olympus digital camera that neither
Windows nor Linux can reliably talk to because of this same problem. Our
solution was to buy a SmartMedia card reader that works with Linux, and
use that rather than plugging the camera directly into the computer. The
SanDisk SDDR-75 is an inexpensive reader for both SmartMedia and
CompactFlash cards that works very nicely for us. The only little trick
it requires is that you have to make sure your Linux kernel was compiled
with support for multiple-LUN SCSI devices (CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN),
since the SmartMedia slot appears as a second LUN.

Craig

Attachment: pgpy8JQxrOloQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: