Re: Odd problem compiling new kernel
On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 21:19, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:42:11AM -0500, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > The gcc-3.x compiler does not work on the kernel. Check what the
> > /usr/bin/gcc symlink points to. If the gcc-3.x compiler, change it to
> > /usr/bin/gcc-2.95 or use environment variables to change the compiler
> > for just kernel builds.
>
> Well, gcc-3.2 is not recommended, but works for lots of people:
>
> rei $ grep "gcc version" /var/log/dmesg
> Linux version 2.4.21-rc2-ac2 (root@rei) (gcc version 3.2.3) #2 Mon May 19 19:37:10 PDT 2003
>
> OTOT, gcc 3.3 is known to fail on the current stable kernel with the very
> error reported in this thread (see recent lkml postings).
>
> There's nothing wrong with unstable.
When you say "There's nothing wrong with unstable.", does that
mean that linux-source-2.4.20 builds using gcc 3.3?
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| Regarding war zones: "There's nothing sacrosanct about a |
| hotel with a bunch of journalists in it." |
| Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard E. Trainor (Retired) |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: