On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 11:21:30AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:58:17AM +0200, Nicolas Kratz wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:31:55AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > > > As baloo suggested this weekend: has my spamassassin autolearned this > > > thing as ham by (doubly) quoting it in full? > > > > Mine has not. It got a score of -0.2, which does not trigger ham > > autolearning. Spamassassin adds "autolearn=[spam|ham]" to the > > X-Spam-Status header if autolearn was triggered, if you don't see > > anything there, nothing happened. > > Ah, I see, :-(. Mine got scores of appr. -14. And yes, autolearn=ham. > Great. So I throw this in a spam folder and let spamassassin manually > autolearn this as spam? Guess so, <sigh>. I know now what to look for, > thanks! I wonder how people's Bayesian filters / autolearners have responded to the subjectless thread from Andrey Yashyn. I hit next-unread in mutt's pager and as soon as the text came onto the screen my mental spam filter gave it a large positive score. I thought it was another Nigerian-type scam, in fact. I was just about to fire it off to spamcop when I noticed that it was (a) short and (b) had a real request for Debian hidden in it. I wonder how many automatic systems gave false positives? -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
Attachment:
pgpL4ZYl8MkTR.pgp
Description: PGP signature